| |
Tussock Grassland Management Information System (ver.
2000)
About this
initiative
The Tussock Grassland Management Information System is intended to
serve as
- a 'one-stop-information shop' for land managers, policy makers,
and other interest groups and,
- as a framework that can be used by scientists, land managers and
policy-makers to refine existing or add new knowledge to the system
as it becomes available through ongoing research (by scientists) and
montoring programmes (by land managers)
IMPORTANT
THIS IS AN EVOLVING MANAGEMENT INFORMATION
SYSTEM Your ideas, comments, and knowledge are required
to help making this information system useful for all those involved
in the management of tussock grasslands in New Zealand - Please take
part in this by providing feedback on this site and its contents.
For example, if you disagree (or agree) with a management guideline,
or you would like to add to the supporting ecological information
on a particular page, click on the "provide feedback on this page"
link. Type your message on the form provided and send. Your message
will automatically go to the information manager of the particular
issue you are dealing with. |
The research
approach (including ISKM)
In the following diagram the two main cycles operating in the resource
management arena are indicated as:
- the "research cycle" (researchers define questions, develop
hypotheses, test them, publish the results,define new questions, etc.
- the "management cycle" (land managers or policy makers implement
a strategy, monitor the outcomes, adapt the strategy if required, monitor
again, etc.)
In the tradional transfer of technology (ToT) paradigm research decisions
are made by scientists, and technology is developed through the research
cycle. Extension agents are then expected to disseminate the findings to
land managers. However, this approach does not seem to work very effectively
in all cases. For example, learning is only experienced by the researchers
and the results of their learning are published in the scientific literature
rather than in a format that can be easily understood and applied by extension
and land managers. As the researchers also only learn from their own work
or other researchers, they learn little or none of the experience of the
land managers. Land managers are expected to apply research results in managing
their land, without the benefit of the learning process and experience of
the scientists.
The only way to overcome these problems, is to more closely link science
with management. The following figure illustrates how the development of
improved information management and collaborative learning is helping
researchers and end-users of research to work more closely together in our
quest for more sustainable land-use in the tussock grasslands of New Zealand.
This approach is based on the Integrated Systems for Knowledge Management
.
What we've done
so far Questionnaires, and individual discussions
were the main elements of the first steps of the approach, i.e. to identify
management goals, to collate existing ecological and management information,
and to "make sense" of this information in order to develop guidelines/principles
by which these goals can be acieved. To date, various workshops with farmers
in Central Otago, conservation staff at Dunedin and Christchurch, representatives
from Otgao and Canterbury Regional Councils, and agents of the Commissioner
of Crown Lands were held to identify and prioritise the management goals,
and to discuss the management options for conservation and production
from these grasslands. For those who might be interested in the nature
of the agendas and outcomes of some of these workshop, click on any of
the following buttons
Questionnaires were sent out to selected farmers, conservation
managers and researchers, to unlock the personal knowledge on the management
of tussock grasslands of as many people as possible. In adition, about 30
farmers from all over the South Island high country were also interviewed
on their properties. This was followed with a literature review of scientific
publications and unpublished reports.
The information from the workshops, questionaires, interviews, and literature
review was structured into a Management Information System framework - the
first version being this one you are about to work with. The information
and manegement guidelines in this version can only be regarded as the "best
knowledge" of researchers, farmers, conservation managers, etc. at this
point in time. An information source of this kind can never be complete,
because our knowledge on how to best manage the land is continuously improving
- not only through ongoing research (by scientists), but also through implementation
(by land managers) of the best knowledge available and then an evaluation
of the outcomes of these actions. The MIS is therefore designed as an
evolving system, which can continuously be updated with new knowledge as
it becomes available over time.
. Given that the dissemination of knowledge, and the continual refinement/updating
with new knowledge are particularly difficult exercises when dealing with
a decentralised grouping of agencies. land managers, and other individuals
within the natural resource management arena, it was decided to design the
MIS for hosting on the INTERNET. The INTERNET is emerging a valuable tool
in information management, which allows people to create, annotate, link
together, and share information from a variety of sources and media, including
text, graphics, images, audio, and video. INTERNET technology will inevitably
play a role in future information systems - not least because it offers
a unifying platform on which the collection of information for both internal
and external use can be provided. The potential of the INTERNET to promote
collaborative learning and problem solving has been pointed out by many
researchers all over the world (e.g. Turoff et al 1991; Carrascal et al
1995; Allen et al 1998).
This MIS is currently interlinked with other modules on the web that are
relevant to tussock grassland management (e.g. weed control (Hieracium Management),
pest control (Tb vector control), and monitoring tools (condition assessment
models for the Tussock Grasslands).
| PLEASE NOTE: if you are working
with a stand-alone version of the MIS on your PC (that is, you are
not linked to the Internet), please feel free to send any comments
you may have per fax to Will Allen, Landcare Research, Lincoln. Fax
number: 03 325 2418 |
Tussock
Grasslands MIS Development Team
MIS Funders and collaborators
The first version of the evolving MIS is the result of a collaborative effort
funded by a variety of organisations:
- Conservation management issues - Department of Conservation
(1995 - present), Ministry for the Environment 1996-1997), Office of
Crown Lands (1996-1998), FRST (1998 - present)
- Hieracium Management: MAF Policy (1994 - 1995), FRST (1996)
- Production issues : MAF Policy (1993 - 1995); - integrated
with conservation, FRST (1998 - present)
However, the development of this first version MIS would not have been possible
without the contributions of ecologists, conservation managers, policy-makers
and farmers. Contribution was through involvement in various workshops,
responding to questionnaires, provision of unpublished and published scientific
material, and photographs.
Past work on the site
- Programme leader (98 - 00): Dr. Ockie Bosch
- Revised MIS structure and design (ver. 2000) Will Allen
- Literature review, MIS structure, and compilation: (Ver. 1998/9)
Kate Wardle
- MIS design (Ver. 1998/9) Robert Gibson & Kate Wardle
- Workshop design and facilitation Will Allen and Kate Wardle
Other credits
- Photography: Peter Johnson kindly provided the photos denoted
by "P.N.J." in the MIS. The remainder were provided by Kate Wardle.
- Other material: Permission was given by Peter Wardle to draw
heavily on his "Vegetation of New Zealand" book (1991), which was used
to provide botanical information on tussock grassland communities.
- Many other people, too many to thank individually, contributed to
the formulation of this first version MIS through their scientific study.
Consult the bibliography for a comprehensive
list of these researchers.
|
|